8372730: Problem list compiler/arguments/TestCodeEntryAlignment.java on x64

[MBaesken]

JDK-8372720 problem listed the test compiler/arguments/TestCodeEntryAlignment.java on macOS x64 but the issue appears on other OS running on x64 CPUs (e.g. Linux) too .

---

Progress

• Change must be properly reviewed (1 review required, with at least 1 Reviewer)
• Change must not contain extraneous whitespace
• Commit message must refer to an issue

Issue

• JDK-8372730: Problem list compiler/arguments/TestCodeEntryAlignment.java on x64 (Sub-task - P4)

Reviewers

• Lutz Schmidt (@RealLucy - Reviewer)
• Goetz Lindenmaier (@GoeLin - Reviewer)

Reviewing

Using git

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git fetch https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28553/head:pull/28553
$ git checkout pull/28553

Update a local copy of the PR:
$ git checkout pull/28553
$ git pull https://git.openjdk.org/jdk.git pull/28553/head

Using Skara CLI tools

Checkout this PR locally:
$ git pr checkout 28553

View PR using the GUI difftool:
$ git pr show -t 28553

Using diff file

Download this PR as a diff file:
https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/pull/28553.diff

Using Webrev

Link to Webrev Comment

[bridgekeeper]

👋 Welcome back mbaesken! A progress list of the required criteria for merging this PR into master will be added to the body of your pull request. There are additional pull request commands available for use with this pull request.

[openjdk]

@MBaesken This change now passes all automated pre-integration checks.

ℹ️ This project also has non-automated pre-integration requirements. Please see the file CONTRIBUTING.md for details.

After integration, the commit message for the final commit will be:

8372730: Problem list compiler/arguments/TestCodeEntryAlignment.java on x64

Reviewed-by: lucy, goetz

You can use pull request commands such as /summary, /contributor and /issue to adjust it as needed.

At the time when this comment was updated there had been 15 new commits pushed to the master branch:

• 3481252: 8372188: AArch64: Generate atomic match rules from M4 stencils
• ef5e744: 8372684: G1: Missing load_acquire() in G1 allocation path
• 969eb1c: 8365861: test/jdk/sun/security/pkcs11/Provider/ tests skipped without SkippedException
• ... and 12 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/08c16c384ac9dac22da960ad718ceb95b41ca660...master

As there are no conflicts, your changes will automatically be rebased on top of these commits when integrating. If you prefer to avoid this automatic rebasing, please check the documentation for the /integrate command for further details.

➡️ To integrate this PR with the above commit message to the master branch, type /integrate in a new comment.

[openjdk]

@MBaesken To determine the appropriate audience for reviewing this pull request, one or more labels corresponding to different subsystems will normally be applied automatically. However, no automatic labelling rule matches the changes in this pull request. In order to have an "RFR" email sent to the correct mailing list, you will need to add one or more applicable labels manually using the /label pull request command.

Applicable Labels

• build
• client
• compiler
• core-libs
• graal
• hotspot
• hotspot-compiler
• hotspot-gc
• hotspot-jfr
• hotspot-runtime
• i18n
• ide-support
• javadoc
• jdk
• jmx
• net
• nio
• security
• serviceability
• shenandoah

[MBaesken]

/label hotspot-compiler

[openjdk]

@MBaesken
The hotspot-compiler label was successfully added.

[mlbridge]

Webrevs

• 00: Full (4556787c)

[RealLucy]

LGTM

[GoeLin]

LGTM, too.

[MBaesken]

Thanks for the reviews !

/integrate

[openjdk]

Going to push as commit 5bd7db034aaf8aa6780945e02a7f9a35e16b036e.
Since your change was applied there have been 15 commits pushed to the master branch:

• 3481252: 8372188: AArch64: Generate atomic match rules from M4 stencils
• ef5e744: 8372684: G1: Missing load_acquire() in G1 allocation path
• 969eb1c: 8365861: test/jdk/sun/security/pkcs11/Provider/ tests skipped without SkippedException
• ... and 12 more: https://git.openjdk.org/jdk/compare/08c16c384ac9dac22da960ad718ceb95b41ca660...master

Your commit was automatically rebased without conflicts.

[openjdk]

@MBaesken Pushed as commit 5bd7db0.

💡 You may see a message that your pull request was closed with unmerged commits. This can be safely ignored.